REVIEW: Verity (2026 Film) - Starring Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett

Review by Jon Donnis

Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett find themselves caught up in a deeply dysfunctional family drama in Verity, Michael Showalter’s adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s 2018 novel. This erotic psychological thriller combines obsession, infidelity and disturbing family secrets, with a manuscript that threatens to change everything its discoverer believes about the people around her. It is often ridiculous, but there is enough twisted drama to make it an entertaining watch.

Johnson plays Lowen Ashleigh, a published author struggling to find an audience for her work while grieving the death of her mother. Her fortunes appear to change when a publisher offers her the chance to finish a bestselling series written by Verity Crawford (Hathaway). Following a near-fatal car accident, Verity has supposedly been left catatonic. Her condition is being kept from the public to prevent readers from believing the series has come to an end.

Lowen accepts the assignment and moves into the Crawfords’ secluded lakeside home in Vermont. There she meets Verity’s husband, Jeremy (Hartnett), and their young son, Crew. The family is also mourning the recent drowning of Crew’s twin sister, Harper, leaving an already difficult situation charged with grief. Lowen’s job is to work through Verity’s notes and establish how to continue the series, but she soon discovers an unfinished autobiographical manuscript that proves considerably more disturbing than anything she expected to find.

The document describes Verity’s obsession with Jeremy and her growing resentment towards their children, whom she apparently viewed as rivals for his affection. Lowen is horrified by what she reads and initially abandons the manuscript, but the revelations leave her questioning the woman she has been hired to replace. She also begins to suspect that Verity, despite her apparent inability to move or speak, may be more aware of her surroundings than anyone realises.

Meanwhile, Lowen grows closer to Jeremy, and their attraction develops into an affair. Her feelings for him complicate her attempts to understand the manuscript, particularly as its contents suggest a deeply disturbing explanation for the family’s tragedy. The question of whether Verity’s account is a genuine confession or a work of fiction becomes increasingly difficult to ignore, especially when Lowen discovers that Jeremy has not been entirely honest with her himself.

The film makes good use of this uncertainty, at least initially. Verity’s profession as a novelist gives the manuscript an interesting ambiguity, since its author is accustomed to inventing stories from the perspectives of immoral characters. Lowen has to decide whether she has uncovered the truth about a deeply troubled woman or become caught up in a story designed to manipulate whoever reads it. Unfortunately, the more the film reveals, the less convincing some of its developments become.

Hathaway is the standout performer. Even when Verity is supposedly incapable of responding to those around her, she gives the character an unsettling quality that makes it difficult to dismiss her as helpless. Johnson is convincing as Lowen, a writer whose professional ambitions and growing attraction to Jeremy cloud her judgement. Hartnett completes the central trio, portraying a grieving husband whose motives become increasingly difficult to read. All three seem comfortable with the material, embracing its heightened emotions rather than attempting to make every development feel entirely realistic.

There is also considerable entertainment in watching attractive people in beautiful surroundings make such appallingly bad decisions. The secluded house and picturesque lake provide an effective contrast to the ugliness of the family’s secrets, while the relationships become increasingly tangled. The film is at its most enjoyable when it embraces the sheer unpleasantness of its characters and allows the drama to become gloriously excessive.

The trouble is that excessive drama is not the same as convincing suspense. Some of the twists are so implausible that they risk turning tension into disbelief. The film keeps raising the stakes, but the characters' behaviour becomes increasingly difficult to accept, and certain revelations feel more interested in shocking the audience than making sense. A psychological thriller can be outrageous, but it still needs a degree of credibility to make its surprises land properly.

At nearly two hours, Verity also takes too long to tell its story. The central mystery is enough to hold attention, but the repeated suspicions and confrontations begin to weigh down the pacing. A tighter edit would have helped the film maintain momentum and given its more extreme developments greater impact.

Despite these shortcomings, Verity is arguably the most entertaining of the recent Colleen Hoover adaptations, with Hathaway doing much of the work needed to keep it engaging. Fans of the novel should find plenty to enjoy, while anyone drawn to trashy psychological thrillers may appreciate its mixture of erotic tension, family secrets and increasingly outrageous behaviour.

Verity is ridiculous fun, but its implausible twists and excessive running time stop it from becoming anything particularly memorable. It is the sort of film you can enjoy on the night, then spend a little time discussing simply because some of its developments are so absurd. By the following day, however, you may struggle to remember much beyond Hathaway and the more outrageous turns of the plot.

I score Verity a deserved 7 out of 10.

Buy the book at https://link.amazon/B00prGWNa

Coming soon to Apple TV - https://apple.co/4hUPFlU

REVIEW: Digger (2026 Film) - Starring Tom Cruise

Review by Jon Donnis

Alejandro González Iñárritu's Digger is an ambitious black comedy that takes aim at corporate greed, political hypocrisy and the environmental consequences of humanity's dependence on fossil fuels. Starring Tom Cruise as an ageing oil magnate facing the consequences of his company's actions, this film has plenty of ideas, impressive visuals and a genuinely committed central performance. Unfortunately, its humour and storytelling do not always match its ambitions.

Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, a wealthy businessman whose drilling operations trigger an ecological catastrophe. As the situation threatens to spiral out of control, he attempts to present himself as humanity's saviour, despite his own role in creating the crisis. It is an absurd premise with obvious satirical potential, particularly when the politicians around him appear more interested in protecting their reputations than addressing the problem.

Cruise is the film's biggest asset. Moving away from his familiar action-hero roles, he delivers an exaggerated, theatrical performance that makes full use of Digger's arrogance, desperation and delusions of grandeur. He commits wholeheartedly to the character, creating a figure who is both ridiculous and strangely compelling. It is a welcome reminder of Cruise's range, and his performance provides much of the film's energy.

The visuals are another highlight. Iñárritu makes effective use of colour, movement and scale, while the production design gives the film a distinctive appearance. The environmental catastrophe provides opportunities for striking imagery, and the craftsmanship behind the sets and carefully constructed environments is evident throughout.

The storytelling is more unconventional than the initial premise suggests. Digger explores the relationship between theatre, cinema and reality, using a stage production as a means of examining how society processes disaster and human suffering. This approach adds an interesting dimension to the film, raising questions about whether satire can genuinely challenge those in power or simply turn serious issues into entertainment.

Its environmental and political commentary is also relevant. Digger's defence of his business interests exposes the convenient arguments used to excuse corporate responsibility, while the political response highlights the dangers of prioritising public image over practical solutions. These ideas give the film substance beyond its more outrageous comic situations.

However, Digger is considerably less successful when it comes to making its audience laugh. Much of the humour feels forced, with absurd situations and exaggerated performances failing to deliver the consistent laughs the film needs. The satire occasionally feels more concerned with being provocative than being funny, leaving some potentially effective moments disappointingly flat.

There is also a tendency to overstate its message. Corporate greed and political hypocrisy are clear targets, but the film repeatedly returns to familiar points instead of allowing its ideas to speak for themselves. This heavy-handed approach, combined with a running time of over two hours, makes parts of the film feel unnecessarily drawn out.

The supporting cast includes Riz Ahmed as environmental safety chief Dr Nirav Ganesh, John Goodman as President Compson, Michael Stuhlbarg as Vice President Eddie, Sandra Hüller as Emma Rockwell and Jesse Plemons as Kenny Rockwell. The ensemble is impressive, but several characters receive limited development, leaving talented performers with less to work with than their casting might suggest.

The film's structural experimentation is intriguing, although not entirely successful. Its shifting perspective changes how the audience understands the story, but the transition does not always feel seamless. While the theatrical elements provide an opportunity to explore the limits of satire, they occasionally interrupt the momentum rather than strengthening the drama.

Pacing remains a problem throughout. Some scenes linger beyond their usefulness, while repeated commentary dilutes the impact of the film's stronger observations. A tighter edit would have given the comedy more room to breathe and helped the central ideas land with greater force.

Digger is ultimately a mixed bag, but there is more to admire than criticise. Its visual ambition, willingness to experiment and contemporary themes make it an interesting film, while Tom Cruise delivers a bold performance that lifts the material above its weaker moments.

The inconsistent humour, underdeveloped supporting characters and occasionally self-important approach prevent it from reaching its full potential. Nevertheless, there is enough here to make it an enjoyable watch, even if the finished film falls short of what its ambitions promise.

Digger could, and perhaps should, have been better, but Cruise gives it a strong centre and Iñárritu delivers a film that is difficult to dismiss outright.

I score Digger a fair 7 out of 10.

Out In Cinemas Now

REVIEW: Heart of the Beast (2026 Film) - Starring Brad Pitt

Review by Jon Donnis

Heart of the Beast takes a fairly straightforward survival premise and gives it an emotional centre through the relationship between retired Special Forces veteran James Belmont and his combat dog, Odin. After a plane crash leaves them stranded deep in the Alaskan wilderness, the pair face a 56-mile journey towards civilisation, with injuries, predators and the elements standing in their way.

The relationship between James and Odin is easily the film's strongest element. Their history together is believable, and the way they rely on each other gives the journey genuine emotional weight. Odin never feels like a simple sentimental prop either. His natural expressions and reactions make him feel like a character in his own right, while his loyalty to James provides many of the film's most effective moments.

Brad Pitt also works well in the lead role. Rather than playing James as an indestructible action hero, Pitt gives him a quieter vulnerability. James is experienced and capable, but he is also carrying the psychological scars of his military career and struggling with PTSD. That makes his increasingly desperate fight to survive more convincing, particularly during the quieter stretches of the journey.

The Alaskan wilderness is another major strength. The scenery is spectacular, while the enormous distances and remote setting give the film a convincing sense of isolation. Some of the best scenes require very little beyond James, Odin and the environment around them, allowing the scale of the wilderness to create much of the tension.

There are several strong survival sequences as well. The confrontation with the grizzly bear is tense, while the bridge sequence provides a particularly effective demonstration of Odin's importance when James is injured. The later wolf attack is considerably more violent and pushes James towards his physical limits.

Unfortunately, the film becomes less convincing as the journey progresses. James suffers so many injuries and encounters so many dangers that his continued survival eventually starts to feel implausible. What begins as a harsh survival story gradually starts to resemble a collection of increasingly extreme obstacles.

The CGI wildlife is also disappointing. The real Alaskan landscapes look excellent, but some of the computer-generated animals are noticeably less convincing. That creates an awkward contrast, because the film otherwise does a good job of establishing a realistic and unforgiving wilderness.

The repeated war flashbacks are another weakness. James's military background is important to understanding him, but the flashbacks become distracting rather than adding much to the story. The film is more effective when it stays focused on the immediate struggle facing James and Odin.

I also think the decision to reveal Odin's survival at the beginning weakens some of the suspense. It removes much of the uncertainty surrounding the dog's fate, meaning several dangerous encounters involving Odin carry less tension than they otherwise could have. There is still plenty of concern for James, but the stakes are uneven.

Heart of the Beast can also become too sentimental. The bond between James and Odin is strong enough to generate an emotional response naturally, so some of the more obvious attempts to underline that relationship feel unnecessary.

Even with those problems, there is plenty to enjoy. The central relationship works, Pitt gives the film a solid lead performance, and the Alaskan setting provides some genuinely impressive visuals. The best sections are intimate and straightforward, focusing on two companions trying to survive rather than attempting to turn every obstacle into another major action sequence.

Heart of the Beast is not a flawless survival thriller, but its strongest elements are strong enough to carry it. The film occasionally overdoes the injuries, flashbacks and sentimentality, while the wildlife effects can undermine its realism. However, the combination of Brad Pitt, an impressive setting and an engaging central relationship makes this well worth a watch.

I score Heart of the Beast a solid 9 out of 10.

In Cinemas Now and coming soon to

Apple TV https://apple.co/4hQUWMp

PREVIEW: ELSINORE (2026 Film) - Starring Andrew Scott, Olivia Colman, Billie Piper, Johnny Flynn and Luke Thompson

Preview by Jon Donnis

Andrew Scott takes on the role of acclaimed actor Ian Charleson in ELSINORE, a new drama directed by BAFTA-nominated Simon Stone, director of The Dig, and written by BAFTA winner and Golden Globe nominee Stephen Beresford, writer of Pride.

Based on Charleson's life, the film follows the actor as he prepares to play Hamlet at London's National Theatre while facing incredible odds and working towards what would become the performance of his life.

Scott, who also serves as a producer on ELSINORE, stars alongside Olivia Colman, the Academy Award, Golden Globe and Emmy winner and BFI Fellow known for The Favourite, The Crown and The Lost Daughter.

The cast also includes Billie Piper, Johnny Flynn, Luke Thompson, Monica Dolan, Juliet Stevenson, Joe Locke, Adeel Akhtar, Matthew Beard, David Dawson, Kadiff Kirwan, Dickie Beau and BAFTA winner Peter Mullan.

The film is produced by Andrea Occhipinti of Lucky Red, Gabrielle Tana of Magnolia Mae Films, Pete Shilaimon and Mickey Liddell of LD Entertainment, alongside Stefano Massenzi and Carolyn Marks Blackwood.

ELSINORE will open the 70th edition of the BFI London Film Festival on 7 October, before arriving in UK cinemas through STUDIOCANAL on 29 January 2027.

REVIEW: Kung Fu Soccer (2026 Film) - Directed by Stephen Chow

Review by Jon Donnis

Kung Fu Soccer difficult to judge without thinking about Shaolin Soccer. Written and directed by Stephen Chow, this spiritual successor takes the familiar idea of combining football with martial arts and gives it a new identity by focusing on the fictional Emei women's football team.

The setup works well. Emei are a grassroots team of ordinary working women, struggling with limited funding, poor facilities, injuries and prejudice against women playing football. Led by veteran captain Shuangshuang (Zhang Xiaofei), they enter the tournament as huge underdogs and gradually discover that teamwork is more important than relying on one player to carry them.

The football is one of the film's biggest strengths. This is obviously not realistic football, but that is hardly the point. Once the matches begin, the combination of football and kung fu produces some wonderfully ridiculous sequences, with martial arts techniques, exaggerated abilities and increasingly absurd action. The final match is particularly entertaining and delivers the sort of escalating madness that fans of Shaolin Soccer will be hoping for.

The comedy also has a very recognisable Stephen Chow feel. There are exaggerated characters, slapstick situations and plenty of physical humour, while the cartoonish visual effects suit the deliberately over-the-top style. The actresses playing the Emei team are also convincing during the football and martial arts sequences, helping the action feel more believable within the film's deliberately absurd world.

I particularly like the decision to centre the story around a women's team. It gives Kung Fu Soccer its own identity rather than simply repeating Shaolin Soccer with a different cast. The international tournament also gives the opposing teams their own personalities, rather than making them generic villains.

Unfortunately, the film never quite reaches the level of Shaolin Soccer. That film found a stronger balance between comedy, heart and memorable characters, while Kung Fu Soccer sometimes feels more like an attempt to recreate that formula.

The emotional story is where it falls short. Shuangshuang's relationships with Yu Long (Dilraba Dilmurat) and Xu Feng (Lay Zhang) are interesting, and her realisation that she has put too much pressure on her teammates gives her character some development. However, there are too many players and supporting characters competing for attention, meaning several never receive enough development to make their personal stories particularly meaningful.

The comedy is also inconsistent. Some jokes are genuinely funny, but others feel familiar, and the constant slapstick can become tiring. The CGI does not always help either, with some larger sequences looking noticeably cheap and unfinished.

The football can be equally frustrating. Even allowing for the deliberately ridiculous approach, some of the action makes little sense from a footballing perspective, while the repeated structure of the tournament means some matches begin to feel similar.

Despite those problems, I enjoyed Kung Fu Soccer. At around 100 minutes it perhaps feels slightly longer than necessary, but there is enough comedy, action and inventive football to keep it entertaining.

It is not going to replace Shaolin Soccer, and it lacks some of the spark that made Stephen Chow's older films so memorable. However, as a silly, energetic sports comedy with plenty of kung fu and outrageous football, it delivers enough fun to justify its existence.

This is not really a film for serious football fans, nor is it likely to appeal to anyone unfamiliar with Stephen Chow's particular style of Chinese comedy. For fans of Shaolin Soccer, though, there is plenty here to enjoy.

I score Kung Fu Soccer 8 out of 10.

In selected cinemas now